At Atlas, technical excellence extends beyond project delivery — it includes advancing the standards, practices and people that shape the construction industry. Jaclyn Ferraro, Senior Concrete Petrographer and Team Manager, and Jay Dorst, National Practice Manager – Forensics and Structural Investigations, highlight their work at Atlas, the complex infrastructure projects they support and their leadership within professional organizations such as the American Concrete Institute, ASTM International and various certification programs.

Together, Jaclyn and Jay embody Atlas’ commitment to technical rigor, collaboration and industry leadership — advancing not only projects, but the standards and practices that shape the built environment.

Both of you work in highly technical disciplines. How would you describe your focus at Atlas?

Jaclyn Ferraro: My role centers on petrography — understanding construction materials at a microscopic level to answer real, practical questions. At Atlas, I manage our petrographic laboratory services while also working nationally on forensic investigations, aggregate evaluations and condition assessments of concrete and construction materials. Whether we’re investigating issues that present themselves during construction, damage that develops over time such as chemical reactions within the concrete, or singular events such as fire damage, the objective is always the same: to provide clear information so clients can make informed decisions about their structures and materials.

Jay Dorst: My focus is broader but complementary to Jaclyn’s work. I support structural and metallurgical engineering, welding, corrosion and specialty testing — often on large, complex infrastructure and building projects. At Atlas, I lead teams involved in quality assurance programs, forensic investigations, source inspections and structural testing. A core part of my role is translating highly technical findings into actionable guidance so owners, agencies and contractors can address challenges while keeping projects moving forward safely.

Much of Atlas’ work involves quality assurance and independent oversight on complex infrastructure projects across the country. Are there any projects you’ve worked on that you find particularly rewarding as a professional in this industry?

Jay Dorst:
One effort that stands out involved providing independent quality assurance and oversight on a large, statewide transportation program. I led teams evaluating weld quality, prestressed concrete girder performance and fabrication conditions across multiple structures. The level of rigor required on projects like this is exceptionally high, as the work supports safety, long-term durability and confidence in major infrastructure investments.

Another impactful example was a high-rise building investigation, where our team performed independent forensic evaluations and laboratory testing to understand contributing factors related to structural performance concerns identified during construction. Projects like these highlight the importance of objective, technical oversight — particularly on fast-paced, complex projects where coordination, accountability and performance expectations are high.

Jaclyn Ferraro: Forensic concrete investigations are always impactful because they help explain what’s happening within the material and why certain behaviors or conditions develop. My work frequently involves evaluating deterioration related to freeze-thaw exposure, chemical attack, strength deficiencies or aggregate reactivity. I also support aggregate qualification and air-void system analyses for airfield paving and heavy-duty pavements.

Professional organizations and certifications play a major role in your work. Why is this involvement so important?

Jaclyn Ferraro: Professional organizations are essential to advancing quality, consistency and technical excellence in the concrete industry. I’ve been an active member of the American Concrete Institute Illinois Chapter (ACI-IL) for more than 10 years and have served on its Board of Directors since 2021. I stepped into executive leadership roles beginning in 2024 and currently serve as Chapter President.

ACI plays a vital role in developing technical resources, best practices and certification programs that influence how concrete is designed, produced, tested and evaluated. At the chapter level, we focus on providing education, professional networking and certification support for practitioners across the state, while remaining closely aligned with national and international standards.

This year’s ACI Convention in Rosemont, Illinois, was especially meaningful. Atlas was a sponsor and ACI-IL was the host and sponsoring chapter. I had the opportunity to co-chair the convention and to welcome attendees during the Opening Session.

Beyond ACI, I’m deeply involved with ASTM International (the American Society for Testing and Materials). ASTM develops industry-standard specifications and test methods used to evaluate the strength, durability and performance of cement and aggregate materials. These standards provide consistency across laboratories, job sites and investigations, and are foundational to quality and repeatability in construction projects. I’m also active with the Society of Concrete Petrographers (SCP), which supports collaboration, peer learning and mentoring within this highly specialized discipline.

Supporting the next generation is one of the most rewarding aspects of this work. I’m especially proud that my Atlas colleague, Alethea Muno, Petrographer II, was recently selected as an ASTM Emerging Professional — a recognition that reflects both her technical potential and Atlas’ broader commitment to cultivating future industry leaders.

Jay Dorst: From an engineering and construction perspective, standards and certifications provide the framework that allows complex projects to move forward with confidence. I’ve been a member of the American Concrete Institute since 2014 and am actively involved in several technical committees that influence construction quality and safety.

I serve as a voting member of ACI Committees C680 and C681, which oversee certification programs for installers and inspectors of post‑installed anchors in concrete, and as a voting member and Vice Chair of ACI Committee 355, which focuses on anchor qualification and performance. I currently serve as Task Group Chair leading efforts to improve anchor testing in moving cracks — work that supports structural performance in seismic and dynamic conditions.

I have also been actively involved with ASTM International for more than 20 years, serving as a member of Committees E6.11 and E6.13. Throughout that time, I have contributed to and drafted multiple ASTM standards related to testing of fiber‑reinforced polymers and anchors to concrete. These standards support consistency and reliability across engineering, construction and forensic investigations.

How do your disciplines intersect when it comes to advanced expertise in safety management and risk mitigation — critical considerations when solving client challenges?

Jay Dorst: Many challenges don’t fit neatly into a single category. A structural concern may be influenced by material behavior, fabrication practices, welding quality or environmental exposure, which makes collaboration essential.

Alongside Jaclyn’s petrography laboratory, within my team, we maintain a forensic metallurgical laboratory, structural engineering support and field-testing teams that provide complementary support depending on the scope of the investigation. This approach allows us to evaluate materials, structural performance and construction practices together, helping clients understand what occurred and how those factors affect durability, performance and safety.

Jaclyn Ferraro: Exactly. Petrography often answers the “why,” while engineering answers the “so what.” At Atlas, those conversations happen naturally across disciplines, allowing us to deliver more complete conclusions.

What keeps you motivated in your work at Atlas?

Jaclyn Ferraro: Solving problems that matter, contributing to the profession through standards development and mentoring the next generation of materials professionals.

Jay Dorst: The combination of technical challenges and real-world impact. When our work strengthens decision-making and supports the quality and safety of the built environment, that’s incredibly rewarding.

Independent Quality Oversight for a Critical Texas Corridor

Quality at the Core of Texas’ I‑35 Northeast Expansion Program

The is among the most significant transportation investments underway in Texas. Designed to relieve congestion, improve safety and support long‑term mobility, the program targets a critical corridor serving the San Antonio region. Delivering infrastructure at this scale requires more than design and construction expertise — it demands disciplined, independent quality oversight to protect public investment and deliver long-term value.

Modernizing One of Texas’ Most Congested Interstate Corridors

Spanning several counties, the multi-phase I-35 NEX Program is modernizing one of Texas’ most congested interstate corridors through toll-free elevated lanes, new connector bridges, enhanced interchanges and supporting infrastructure. These improvements are designed to accommodate population growth, regional commuting and freight movement. As the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) advances this complex program, independent quality assurance connects early design decisions to field execution.

Building Quality Assurance into the Program from the Start

Since 2021, Atlas has served as an independent quality partner on this program, providing oversight across multiple phases and supporting outcomes that matter to project owners and the communities they serve. In this role, Atlas helps strengthen decision‑making and promotes consistency across delivery teams operating within a complex, multi-phase environment.

Atlas’ involvement began during the design stage of the I-35 NEX Central project — a $1.5 billion effort covering 9.5 miles from I‑410 North to FM 3009 — when the firm was selected to provide independent design quality assurance services. These efforts included design reviews aligned with TxDOT requirements, design‑build contract criteria and accepted engineering practices, helping strengthen constructability and reduce downstream risk early in the program.

That early engagement established a strong technical foundation for large-scale construction and continues to guide Atlas’ role on the project today. On the I-35 NEX Central phase, Atlas provides ongoing quality oversight supporting elevated lanes with direct connectors, curved steel girder bridges and complex foundation systems.

Independent Construction Quality Assurance on I-35 NEX South ��

That foundation carried directly into construction. In 2024, Atlas was awarded the independent quality assurance services contract for Phase 1 of the I‑35 NEX South Project, an effort to deliver 4.2 miles of toll‑free improvements between I‑410 South and I‑410 North. Serving as both the Professional Services Quality Assurance Firm and Independent Quality Firm, Atlas manages a comprehensive quality program encompassing design reviews, field inspections, materials testing, audits and construction oversight. This work supports elevated viaduct construction utilizing prestressed concrete beams and concrete piers. Within a joint‑venture delivery structure, Atlas provides objective, third‑party oversight that supports accountability and confidence throughout construction.

Protecting Public Investment Through Independent Quality Assurance

Beyond technical execution, independent quality assurance plays a vital role in protecting public investment while supporting safer travel, longer service life and infrastructure that better serves economic activity and daily mobility throughout the region.

“Atlas is proud to partner on the I‑35 NEX Program and help positively impact the San Antonio region,” said Tom Price, Atlas Infrastructure President. “Our work — from design quality reviews to independent construction oversight — reflects how we support DOTs in Texas and across the country on complex programs: steady, objective and focused on consistency across every phase. This approach helps reduce surprises, strengthens accountability and supports infrastructure that makes moving through major cities safer and more reliable for everyone.”

Learn more about Atlas’ Quality Management services.��

Subsurface utility engineering (SUE) helps project teams avoid major risks — such as delays, safety hazards, unexpected costs and public disruption — by accurately locating underground utilities before construction begins. We caught up with Atlas’ East Region Utility Manager and SUE lead to get insight into why SUE should be seen as an investment and not an added expense to project costs. He highlights a recent project for the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) which showcases the value of 3D SUE technology by mapping extensive underground and overhead utility data into a detailed 3D model. The information provided to GDOT improved design decisions early in the project and minimized potential construction issues.

In the world of infrastructure, transportation and site development, one of the most overlooked risks comes from what lies beneath the surface: underground utilities. Systems like water, gas, electric, telecom and sewer lines create a complicated network that isn’t always accurately documented. When these utilities are struck or incorrectly located, the consequences can be significant — causing delays, safety risks and costly emergency repairs.

This is why subsurface utility engineering (SUE) is so important. SUE combines historical records research, advanced geophysical technologies and precise surveying to detect, identify and map underground utilities long before construction begins. By doing this early, project teams gain clear visibility into potential conflicts and can make better decisions throughout design and construction.

SUE has consistently proven to deliver one of the highest returns on investment in civil and construction projects. It’s a strategic tool that reduces risk, saves time and protects budgets.

Q: What is the cost of not knowing where underground utilities are? Or what happens if underground utilities are inaccurately located or undocumented?

The cost of not knowing the location of underground utilities can be severe, impacting every aspect of a project. When utilities are inaccurately mapped or completely unknown, project teams can face a series of escalating problems that jeopardize both safety and budgets, such as:

• Construction delays – When crews encounter unexpected utilities, work often stops immediately. Redesigns, relocations and change orders must be made on the fly, slowing progress and pushing schedules far beyond what was planned. These interruptions can ripple through the entire project timeline.
• Safety hazards – Striking a utility line isn’t just inconvenient, it can be dangerous. Hitting gas, electric or high-pressure lines puts workers, nearby residents and the public at risk.
• Unexpected costs – Emergency repairs, damage to utility infrastructure, specialized response teams and service restoration all come with significant price tags. These unplanned expenses can quickly overwhelm a project’s contingency budget and lead to substantial overruns.
• Public disruption – Utility strikes often affect far more than the construction site. They can cause service outages, traffic closures and public frustration.

This is why the financial value of SUE is so important to consider. According to a , every $1 invested in SUE delivers an average of $4.62 in measurable cost savings, with total returns commonly cited by FHWA in the $4–$20 range when broader risk‑reduction benefits are considered. Even under conservative estimates, SUE routinely delivers returns exceeding 400%. These numbers are not hypothetical; they’re backed by years of documented research from Departments of Transportation and proven results across the private sector.

Q: If we look beyond just the dollar cost of not using SUE, what other values do you see in terms of risk reduction and reputation?

Beyond the financial savings, SUE provides significant value in both risk reduction and protecting a project’s reputation. By identifying underground utilities early, teams greatly reduce the likelihood of utility strikes, safety incidents and unexpected disruptions. Fewer surprises mean smoother schedules, more predictable outcomes and a safer work environment for crews and the public.

There’s also a strong reputational benefit. Projects that avoid utility issues tend to stay on schedule, maintain public trust and demonstrate strong stewardship of taxpayer and stakeholder resources. When agencies and contractors deliver projects without delays, damage or service interruptions, it reinforces confidence in their processes, professionalism and commitment to safety. Ultimately, SUE helps safeguard not only the budget, but also the credibility of the team delivering the project.

Q: What advice can you offer clients when it comes to knowing when or whether to engage SUE?

The earlier SUE is integrated into a project, the more value it brings throughout the entire lifecycle of design and construction. When SUE is engaged during the concept and preliminary design stages, project teams gain a much clearer understanding of existing underground conditions before making major decisions. This early insight reduces the likelihood of costly redesigns, helps establish realistic budgets and provides designers with accurate information rather than assumptions.

As the project moves into final design, SUE continues to deliver significant benefits. With accurate data on utility locations, engineers can identify potential conflicts in advance and incorporate solutions directly into design plans. This proactive approach prevents issues that would otherwise surface during construction, where changes are not only more disruptive but also substantially more expensive.

SUE’s value doesn’t stop once construction begins. During field activities, SUE professionals verify utility locations to support real-time conflict resolution and guide necessary adjustments. This reduces the chances of unexpected discoveries, keeps crews safe and helps maintain project momentum by avoiding delays caused by unforeseen underground conditions.

In today’s project environment, SUE is not just a “nice to have” — it is an essential investment in responsible, risk-aware project delivery. Teams that integrate SUE into their standard workflow experience fewer surprises, reduced risk and stronger financial outcomes, ultimately protecting both the project budget and schedule.

From my perspective, it all comes down to one simple truth: if we know what’s underground, we can work around it. Planning around utilities will always be far cheaper and far safer than hitting an unmarked line during construction and learning the hard way. ��

Q: Is there an example of how Atlas has leveraged its SUE capabilities on a complex infrastructure project?

We recently leveraged Atlas’ 3D SUE capabilities to help GDOT gain valuable insight into a 3.5-mile section of its roadway. The goal was to build a 3D map of all utilities and attach important details so designers could easily see and understand what was underground.

To do this, Atlas’ SUE team collected information using several methods, including:

• Quality Level B — utility designating to identify and mark the location of buried utilities.
• 14 test holes.
• Data collection on overhead utility poles.
• Sanitary sewer inspections.
• Utility impact analysis with clash detection.

In total, our team mapped more than 130,000 feet of underground utilities, 261 poles, 22 manholes and the 14 test holes. Information about depths came from the test holes, utility owner records and electronic measuring tools.

Once we collected all the horizontal and vertical data, we used it to build the 3D utility files. GIS technology helped by attaching useful details to each utility feature — like size, type and ownership. This enabled designers to simply click on a utility to see all its information.

The final deliverables included a 3D SUE database, a 3D report, the utility impact analysis and all the electronic 3D files.

The views expressed in this article are the authors own and do not reflect the views or opinions of the Georgia Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration or any other DOT which may be mentioned herein.

Elevating Construction Quality with Technology and Process Innovation

With experience leading quality acceptance programs on billion-dollar infrastructure projects like the TxDOT and FlatironDragados New Harbor Bridge, Barry Burks, P.E., is shaping how advanced technology integrates into quality workflows — helping clients reduce risk and accelerate inspection and testing while maintaining rigorous quality standards.

Tell us about your role at Atlas and how it connects to shaping solutions for transportation infrastructure.����

As the Independent Quality Manager, my role begins with developing project-specific Quality Acceptance procedures within the Construction Quality Management Plan. These procedures establish how acceptance inspection and testing will be performed across a project’s construction lifecycle.

By embedding technology — such as digital inspection forms and automated error checking — directly into those processes, we create efficiencies that save time and money while maintaining the quality standards clients expect. That integration becomes especially important on large, complex transportation projects where schedule pressure is high and consistency across various types of work is critical.

Looking back, what pivotal experience most shaped your career in quality management?��

Working with Dr. Garold Oberlender during my master’s program at Oklahoma State University was transformative. He taught me how reducing the duration of repetitive critical path activities can dramatically impact an entire project’s construction timeline.

That insight has driven my focus for the past thirty years: finding the smartest applications of technology to reduce the duration and cost of hold point activities by speeding up inspection and materials testing. It’s about identifying bottlenecks that slow everything down and systematically eliminate them through better tools and processes.

You’ll be speaking at the ��on Independent Quality Management (IQM). Why is IQM especially critical on P3 and progressive design-build projects?

On P3 and other alternative delivery projects, the risk profile is fundamentally different. Design and construction are happening in parallel, commercial implications are significant and decisions often need to be made quickly with imperfect information.

IQM provides a stabilizing influence in that environment. By operating independently from production pressure, IQM helps make sure speed does not come at the expense of long-term performance or durability. It builds confidence that acceptance decisions are grounded in objective, standardized evaluation — which is critical for owners, lenders and private partners.

On large P3 and progressive design-build projects, how does IQM help reduce risk for owners and private partners?

IQM plays a central role in risk mitigation by providing objective, third-party oversight for inspection, testing and acceptance. On alternative delivery projects, technical decisions often carry immediate schedule and financial consequences.

IQM makes sure those decisions are transparent, defensible and aligned with the owner’s standards and not just the ever-present short-term production goals. That independence helps make sure the investment is protected, not just during construction, but for decades after the project is delivered.

The Harbor Bridge Project involved fabrication of steel and precast concrete across numerous facilities. How does IQM help maintain consistency and aid in the management of complexity at that scale? ��

The complexity of the fabrication processes on projects like Harbor Bridge can magnify small disconnects. With fabrication occurring at more than a dozen locations across the country, loss of consistency is one of the biggest risks.

IQM provides a single, standardized framework for inspection, testing and acceptance — regardless of where the work is performed. Acting independently from the production teams, our quality staff serves as the connective tissue between fabrication, field construction and the project stakeholders.

A structured and consistent set of documents and reporting allowed us to identify trends early, resolve issues proactively and keep the acceptance process moving without surprises. On megaprojects, IQM isn’t about slowing production — it’s about helping the Design-Builder identify quality issues before they impact schedule and then working with them to identify the cause and support them in their development of corrective solutions.

How does technology improve transparency and decision-making for owners on large transportation projects?

Technology provides owners with near-real-time visibility into inspection results, test data and acceptance status of all types of work across the project. Digital inspection platforms eliminate information silos and reduce the risk of missed inspection hold points or undocumented decisions.

For projects with multiple sub-contractors and numerous fabrication locations, that transparency supports faster, more confident decision-making while preserving data integrity. All the stakeholders benefit from knowing the status of the acceptance of the work, where schedules may be at risk and what actions are being implemented to mitigate the problems.

What is the biggest challenge and opportunity you see in automation and technology adoption?

The biggest hurdles are economic justification and early implementation. Adopting new technologies often requires upfront investments in equipment, software and training that may take time to show returns.

The key is to present stakeholders with a clear, early picture of both the costs and the long-term benefits. When people understand the full value proposition, the likelihood of acceptance and successful implementation is improved. You need to build the business case alongside the technical case.

When clients roll out new technologies in QA/QC, how do you help make sure the processes deliver results?

Technology is only as good as the people using it and the processes supporting it. We focus on comprehensive training of staff at rollout and reinforce the importance of consistent processes with Pre-Activity meetings before each new work type begins.

Embedding the use of technology into daily workflows — and making certain teams understand why consistency matters — is what turns new tools into time savers.

Can you share a project that highlights how Atlas delivers quality through both process and innovation?

The Harbor Bridge project is a great example. At more than 3,200 feet long and 538 feet tall, it’s the longest concrete segmental cable-stayed bridge in North America. Coordinating quality testing and inspection plans across more than 15 fabrication facilities presented unique challenges.

We equipped our inspectors with tablets and digital inspection forms, allowing real-time reporting and automated error checking in the field. These efficiencies reduced documentation time, improved consistency and helped expedite the acceptance process.

What motivates you in your work every day?��

For me, it’s seeing a well-thought-through procedure put into action in the field or lab and knowing it will lead to more timely acceptance of the work. That’s when preparation pays off and I know that we are doing our part to keep the project moving forward without unnecessary delays.

Every day, we’re contributing to infrastructure projects that our families and communities will rely on for decades. Knowing that our quality processes contribute to safer, more durable bridges, roads and facilities drives me.

Outside of work, where do you find inspiration?��

I enjoy reading journal articles and watching videos and documentaries about emerging technologies across various fields of science and engineering. Seeing how others achieve success through innovation in their work motivates me to explore new approaches in mine.

Innovation comes from connecting ideas across disciplines and applying them in new contexts. Whether its materials science, automation or data analytics, there’s always something that can be adapted to improve construction quality processes.

Connecting in the Field: Meet Barry at the TDOT–ACEC Partnering Conference

This May, Barry Burks will share insights on the critical role of Independent Quality Management (IQM) in delivering large, complex transportation programs at the .

Drawing on his experience supporting the $1.2 billion TxDOT US 81 New Harbor Bridge project, Barry will highlight how independent quality acceptance contributes to more transparent decision-making, stronger collaboration and long-term project performance on P3 and alternative delivery projects. In this role, Atlas served as the Independent Quality Firm, providing construction inspection, materials testing and day-to-day oversight of quality acceptance in alignment with TxDOT’s Quality Acceptance Program.

His session will explore how disciplined quality processes, supported by experienced teams and modern tools, help navigate the complexity of megaprojects — reinforcing consistency, reducing risk and supporting safe, durable infrastructure.

Atlas’ Francis Mouafong, P.E., MBA is a Senior Project Manager at Atlas and currently works as a Construction Quality Assurance Manager on Georgia’s I-285/I-20 East Interchange project. He shares why he loves working as an engineer — and how transportation systems play a vital role in connecting people and strengthening communities.

Engineers play a critical role in helping communities flourish by creating systems that connect people. Nowhere is that impact more visible than in transportation. Thoughtfully designed and well-executed roads, bridges, transit systems, trails and corridors form the backbone of thriving communities — shaping daily lives, economic opportunity and long-term resilience.

For Francis Mouafong, engineering has always been about more than just building roads or verifying specifications on paper. He views his work as a form of stewardship — a commitment to advancing infrastructure that serves people well and stands the test of time. For more than three decades, Francis has contributed to high-impact transportation projects — spending the past 20 years working throughout Georgia on efforts such as:

• I‑285/I‑20 East Interchange project, a major mobility improvement project being done for the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) that involves reconstructing the I-285/I-20 East Interchange ramps with more direct alignments, constructing new lanes, adding auxiliary lanes, replacing bridges and constructing new noise barriers.
• Harbins Road Interchange project, an interchange project that involved bridges, box culvert extensions, retaining walls, ramps, storm drainage, grading, graded aggregate base (GAB) placement, asphalt paving, concrete flatwork, traffic signal installation and more.
• I-75/I-575 Northwest Corridor project, a transformative design-build regional mobility initiative that consisted of building 30 miles of reversible toll lanes and the construction of bridges and walls.
• Gwinnett County SPLOST Road Program, a program that is designed to support the county’s growing population and address its infrastructure needs.

Together, these projects not only improve travel efficiency but they are also enhancing safety, reducing congestion and supporting economic vitality for millions of commuters across the region.

Safeguarding Quality on One of Georgia’s Busiest Interchanges

In his current role on the I-285/I-20 East Interchange project — one of the most complex transportation upgrades in the state — Francis helps guide construction quality across a highly coordinated, fast-paced environment. Once complete, the project will significantly improve traffic flow and safety at what has long been considered one of metro Atlanta’s most congested bottlenecks.

Construction Quality Assurance on a project of this scale requires constant field engagement and disciplined oversight. Francis supports alignment between design intent and field execution, adherence to safety and performance standards and early identification of issues that could affect long-term durability or public access. His role focuses on translating plans and specifications into built infrastructure that performs as intended for the traveling public.

A Commitment to Growth, Learning and Leadership

With more than 33 years of roadway and bridge construction experience, Francis brings a leadership philosophy shaped by experience and adaptability. One lesson guides every project: similar challenges rarely have identical solutions. Effective engineering requires context-driven judgment and responsiveness to site-specific conditions.

That mindset also defines how Francis leads and mentors others. Grateful for the guidance he received early in his career, he places high value on supporting the next generation of engineers. To him, leadership is not about titles — it is about integrity, ownership and a commitment to the communities served.

Through his technical expertise and principled approach to leadership, Francis’ work helps bridge critical gaps:

• Between design and construction.
• Between immediate needs and long-term resilience.
• Between infrastructure systems and the people who rely on them.

By aligning design intent with real-world execution, he helps close the distance between vision and impact — reinforcing the idea that infrastructure is not only about concrete and steel, but about lived experience. ��

Connecting in the Field: Meet Francis at the TDOT-ACEC Partnering Conference

This May, Francis Mouafong will share real-world insights from one of Georgia’s most complex transportation projects at the , taking place May 11-13.

Francis will discuss his work on the $685 million GDOT I-285/I-20 East Interchange Project, focusing on the practical realities of supporting Independent Quality Firm (IQF) services on large-scale, multi-partner transportation programs. Attendees will gain perspective on maintaining independent construction quality assurance, coordinating across stakeholder teams and aligning plans, specifications and field conditions as construction progresses.

His session will highlight how strong collaboration and disciplined quality management contribute to safe, durable infrastructure — lessons that continue to shape transportation projects across the region.

The Foresthill Bridge T‑1 Steel Inspection and Repair Project has earned a National Recognition Award in the , one of the engineering profession’s most prestigious national honors.

Led by Atlas in partnership with Placer County, the project was selected for national recognition following its Honor Award win at the , advancing it to competition at the national level.

The National Recognition Award distinguishes projects that demonstrate exceptional engineering merit, innovation and public value on a national stage.

“This national recognition from ACEC affirms the caliber of work Atlas delivers every day,” said Tom Price, Atlas Infrastructure President. “The Foresthill Bridge project demanded technical excellence and an unwavering commitment to public safety — and our team rose to that challenge. The bridge itself has long held personal meaning for me; I remember walking across it with my great grandfather when it first opened. We’re proud of the dedication our engineers and inspectors brought to this work and honored to partner with Placer County on a project that improves local safety while helping shape national guidance for managing critical infrastructure.”

Engineering excellence at California’s tallest bridge

The Foresthill Bridge, California’s tallest bridge, rises more than 730 feet above the American River canyon and spans 2,428 feet, carrying more than 50,000 vehicles daily between Auburn and Foresthill. Built in 1973 using T‑1 steel, the bridge became part of a federally funded initiative to examine fracture‑critical welds in legacy steel structures nationwide.

Atlas was selected to perform comprehensive non‑destructive ultrasonic testing of 288 fracture‑critical steel welds, a complex undertaking that required inspectors to work at heights exceeding 700 feet while maintaining continuous traffic flow.

Safety-driven results with national impact

Testing revealed a significantly higher‑than‑anticipated defect rate, prompting Atlas to adapt inspection protocols in real time. The team completed 44 targeted weld repairs to American Welding Society (AWS) standards, accelerating safety improvements while maintaining zero safety incidents despite challenging weather and site conditions.

Beyond improving safety for Placer County residents, findings from the Foresthill Bridge project are informing Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) guidance for evaluating T‑1 steel bridges across the country, contributing to a broader shift toward proactive infrastructure maintenance.

National recognition in Washington, D.C.

Atlas and Placer County were honored at the ACEC 2026 Engineering Excellence Awards Gala on May 5, 2026, at the Grand Hyatt Hotel in Washington, D.C., where National Recognition Award winners were celebrated alongside the nation’s top engineering achievements.

By: Ann Boeholt and Camille Felkins, Atlas Senior Environmental Managers

Adaptive management is often described as a best practice, but its value is most evident when projects face conditions no plan can fully anticipate. This case study — shared at the — illustrates how flexibility, collaboration and observation helped guide a project in a complex wetland system on Tribal lands.

Salmon, Sovereignty and Fish Passage

Pacific salmon have long been central to the cultures, economies and lifeways of Pacific Northwest Tribes. Over time, however, state highway infrastructure contributed to fragmented aquatic systems, limiting access to historic spawning and rearing habitats.

Since the 1990s, the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) has worked with Tribes and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife to identify and address fish passage barriers across the state highway system. This work accelerated significantly following a 2013 permanent injunction that established a 2030 deadline for replacing approximately 400 barriers — those expected to reconnect roughly 90 percent of the targeted habitat. Today, this ongoing, collaborative effort focuses on restoring connectivity within waterways that often intersect sensitive environmental and regulatory settings.

A Culvert, a Wetland and Changing Conditions

One such project along U.S. Highway 101 involved installing a fish‑passable culvert in 2025 to restore natural stream function. Adjacent to the site was a mosaic wetland system within the Quinault Indian Reservation.

Shortly after construction, a high‑flow event caused nearby Harlow Creek to overtop its banks. Water moved across the newly graded wetland, forming overflow channels and flow paths not anticipated in the original restoration design. While the culvert performed as intended, the surrounding wetland — newly planted and not fully stabilized — responded rapidly to these conditions.

These changes introduced challenges. Permit requirements included specific restoration and stabilization goals designed to meet water quality standards, while the wetland’s natural response made a rigid, prescriptive approach difficult to apply. In addition, the stream’s new flow path through the wetland meant that no in-stream work could occur until the following summer construction window. Any potential retrofit work within the wetland or stream would also require careful coordination, as these conditions coincided with the federal government shutdown in fall 2025.

Managing Complexity Through Collaboration

Responding effectively required close coordination among WSDOT, Tribal partners and multiple regulatory agencies. Additional constraints, including narrow in‑stream work windows and limited agency availability, reinforced the need for an approach that was both practical and adaptive.

Rather than attempting to force the system back to its original design assumptions, the project team proposed a flexible, adaptive path forward.

Letting the System Inform Solutions

In the near term, the team implemented minimal erosion‑control best management practices to protect the site while limiting additional disturbance. At the same time, they committed to ongoing monitoring to better understand how the wetland functions under post‑construction conditions.

Monitoring showed that the new overflow channels aligned with the wetland’s mosaic character. While the final design solution is still evolving, the longer‑term approach shifted toward stabilizing those channels within the floodplain — supporting ecological function and permit objectives while working with natural processes.

Together, these decisions reflect how adaptive management can support effective outcomes in dynamic environments by allowing real‑world conditions to inform design, permitting and long‑term performance.

Join Us at NAWM

We will share additional lessons learned from this case study during our presentation, “Implementing effective adaptive management to meet project goals in the face of unforeseen and changing conditions,” at the on Thursday, April 30, at 11 a.m.

If you are attending NAWM, we invite you to join the session and connect with us or continue the conversation on LinkedIn.

Q&A: Senior Rail Engineer Dave Bearse provides updates on the Georgia Department of Transportation’s (GDOT) Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Safety (Section 130)��Program.

This week, Dave Bearse, along with LN Manchi and Fahreen Muhammad, will be in Atlanta, Georgia, participating in the , alongside transportation leaders committed to advancing safer rail systems nationwide. As a longtime rail safety partner to GDOT, Atlas brings nearly two decades of experience supporting GDOT’s Section 130 Program — providing technical leadership, strategic planning and collaborative coordination to identify risks and implement proven safety improvements at highway-rail grade crossings across the state. Through this work, Atlas continues to help strengthen Georgia’s rail network while protecting the communities it serves.

Q: What’s your role in the Section 130 Program?

I serve as the technical lead for the Atlas work within the Section 130 Program. My focus is on coordinating and overseeing the technical aspects of railroad safety improvements, working closely with GDOT, CSX Transportation (CSXT), cities, counties and other stakeholders.

Q: Could you provide some background on the Section 130 Program and its origins from your perspective?

The program originated in response to growing highway safety concerns in the late 1960s and early 1970s, when a high number of fatalities at highway-rail grade crossings promoted the federal government to invest highway safety funds in proven countermeasures such as flashing lights and gates. These improvements significantly reduced crashes and laid the foundation for today’s program, which now encompasses a broader range of safety and hazard elimination strategies — including passive warning devices, crossing eliminations, signing and pavement markings, crossing geometric improvements and incentives and construction support to facilitate crossing closures.

Q: Could you elaborate on how your team determines what crossings need improvement?

We work closely with GDOT and railroad consultants to identify crossings that need improvement. Our goal is to maximize safety benefits within the allocated funds. This involves recommending various improvements, such as flashing lights and gates, geometric improvements or suggesting the closure of certain crossings to reduce crash risks.

Q: Can you share some notable achievements or successes of the railroad safety program?

Over the years, the program has significantly reduced fatalities and crashes at railroad grade crossings. Notable achievements include the successful installation of safety features, as well as signing and marking projects to enhance awareness and visibility. Atlas prepared the Georgia Safety Action Plan and an update that were well-received by the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA).

Q: Can you explain the technology behind railroad crossings and how it has evolved over the years, particularly in terms of safety and monitoring?

The technology at railroad crossings has evolved significantly from electromechanical relays in the early days. By the 1980s, these were replaced with computer systems. Nowadays, new installations come with a recording system, essentially a black box, that logs every event at the crossing. Railroads can remotely monitor and analyze this data to support more efficient and safer operations.

Q: How do you determine which railroad crossings need improvements or upgrades? Are there specific criteria or factors that play a role in prioritizing these enhancements?

Prioritizing improvements involves a comprehensive evaluation. Factors include the number of trains and vehicles, the type of warning devices in place, school bus and passenger train usage and crash history. This data feeds into a prioritization system, but it’s not solely based on numerical values. There are subjective elements, like sight distance, proximity to intersections and the crest at the crossing, that contribute to the decision-making process.

Q: Could you share insights into the collaboration with CSX Transportation and how they contribute to the Section 130 Program?

CSX Transportation (CSXT) is a key partner, sharing data that aids in maintaining and updating records for GDOT. The collaboration extends to implementing safety improvements, with CSXT agreeing to maintain the signals installed by GDOT in perpetuity. This partnership highlights the shared commitment to enhancing safety at railroad crossings.

Q: How has the landscape of railroad safety changed over the years? What trends or challenges do you foresee in the future?

Railroad safety has seen significant improvements, particularly with the widespread adoption of flashing lights and gate signals. However, challenges persist, such as the need for ongoing maintenance and replacement of aging infrastructure. Looking ahead, the focus will likely shift from installing new devices to maintaining and improving existing ones so they remain effective and safe.

Q: What role does data play in your decision-making process? How has it evolved in the last decade?

Data is integral to our decision-making process. With advancements in technology, there’s now an abundance of data available, including crash records, train and vehicle counts and warning device types. This data helps us identify high-priority crossings and allocate resources effectively. The transition in recent years involves recognizing the importance of maintaining and improving existing infrastructure rather than solely focusing on installing new safety devices.

Q: Are there any specific initiatives or innovations in the railroad safety sector that you find particularly promising or impactful?

The continuous improvement in technology, such as remote monitoring and recording systems, holds promise for enhancing railroad safety. Additionally, the industry’s recognition of the need to transition from installing new devices to maintaining and improving existing ones is a positive shift. As technology continues to evolve, we can expect further innovations that contribute to the overall safety and efficiency of railroad crossings.

, recognized March 15–21, celebrates the essential role surveyors play in measuring, mapping and understanding our world. This year’s theme, “Celebrating 250 Years of Mapping America,” honors the profession’s long history — while also recognizing how surveying continues to evolve alongside new technologies.

Advancements such as LiDAR and drone‑based data collection are shaping the next chapter of that evolution. These tools enhance accuracy, improve safety and accelerate project delivery, giving surveyors new ways to gather meaningful spatial data while reducing risk in the field.��

A New Era of Surveying

Historically, surveying required crews to physically access project sites and manually collect data points — often over extended periods of time. Today, LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) enables surveyors to capture millions of data points in a single scan, producing highly detailed 3D models of real‑world environments with remarkable efficiency.��

While the tools have changed, the mission remains the same: delivering reliable, precise and actionable spatial information. Modern survey technologies simply make that mission easier to achieve — and often in ways that are safer and more efficient for field teams.

• Safer: Reduces the need for personnel to enter hazardous or hard‑to‑reach areas such as levees, bridge structures, unstable terrain or industrial sites.
• Faster: Enables data collection in days instead of weeks or months.
• Smarter: Produces richer datasets that support better planning, engineering and environmental decision‑making.

Cagatay “Ty” Atmaca

Michelle Lynch
Atlas Engineer

Q: What does the WIC Week theme “Level Up. Build Strong.” mean to you as a woman working in construction sector?

To me, “Level Up. Build Strong.” means continually raising the bar on myself, the quality of our work and how we support one another in this industry. From the beginning of my career supporting complex projects like the San Francisco–Oakland Bay Bridge, I learned that success requires constant growth, including refining how I document contract records, improving communication and mastering the details that drive infrastructure forward.

Attention to detail means anticipating potential issues, making informed decisions and adapting quickly to evolving project needs. It is this commitment — to both communication and detail — that elevates the professionalism of the construction industry, allows teams to learn from past projects and helps each project contribute to lasting progress.

Q: How has your career given you opportunities to build stronger communities?

Much of my work directly impacts community safety and mobility. For example, on the Los Angeles Metro (LA Metro) inspection project where our team is evaluating 235 structures, including tunnels, aerial stations, bridges and underground platforms, I coordinate inspection schedules, organize operational documents and manage communications across multiple agencies and departments. This work requires a high degree of collaboration and meticulous planning due to the complexity and scale of the transit system. My role involves not only making sure that inspections are conducted efficiently and thoroughly but also that each assessment meets stringent safety and quality standards. By coordinating with engineers, project managers and local authorities, I help identify and address potential issues before they can affect service or rider safety. This proactive approach is essential in a system as heavily used as LA Metro, where even minor disruptions can have significant ripple effects on the community.

Ultimately, all these efforts contribute to building public trust in the transportation network, supporting the mobility needs of Los Angeles residents and enhancing the overall quality of life in the region. Every inspection is an opportunity to not only maintain but also improve the infrastructure, making sure the transit system is safe for the millions who depend on it every day.

Q: In what ways have you had to level up throughout your career?

Early on, working on federal and state projects required me to quickly develop a deep understanding of quality assurance, federal specifications, progress payment systems and contract closeout procedures. My roles supporting the Federal Highway Administration required me to review construction contract records, perform detailed Quality Assurance (QA) reviews, reconcile project documentation and communicate findings clearly to the construction support team. I had to level up my performance by taking on several tasks simultaneously, learning complex systems and consistently meeting deadlines across multiple active contracts. Those experiences built both my confidence and capabilities.

Q: Do you have a special mentor that has influenced your career? How do you hope to make a lasting impact on the construction industry?

I’ve been fortunate to work with leaders who modeled professionalism and helped me grow, from reviewing detailed contract claims to drafting final payment packages and organizing project systems to meet federal compliance standards.

��I want to help build a future where our work continues to strengthen the communities around us and provide meaningful careers.

I believe that this year’s theme, “Level Up. Build Strong.” serves as a reminder that every project, every inspection and every contract review is an opportunity to strengthen something bigger than ourselves. When women lead in construction and support the bigger initiative, we strengthen:

• Communities, by improving the safety and reliability of transportation networks.
• Careers, by opening doors for others and raising the standards of practice.
• Futures, by ensuring the next generation inherits infrastructure and an industry that is better than what we found.

We are building more than bridges and tunnels. We are building possibility, and that might be the ultimate level up.